Wednesday, December 17, 2014

THE NEXT FINANCIAL CRISIS

                                            THE NEXT FINANCIAL CRISIS
The $1.1 trillion spending bill will fund the US government until September 2015. This bill is a tripartite alliance between the White house, the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. This alliance is not new, it is at the origin of the repeal of “Glass–Steagall” in November 1999 and increase of synthetic assets in our financial system. The tripartite alliance is a product of the functioning mechanism of “Bipartisanship”. This political dualism has been an extraordinary force of American democracy, but start to loose its strength at the end of the 20th century. “Bipartisanship” represent a political eco-system of the 20th century and cannot satisfy the political exigencies of the 21st century or shape the future of American democracy. The bill demonstrates that the structure of “Bipartisanship” is no longer a positive function of American democracy and capitalism. Here is what I wrote about the inefficiency of “Bipartisanship” in the 21st century:
“Temptation of conquest of power and degradation of democracy are the two most important political risk of bipartisanship. This political structure has a propensity to transform productive symmetric relationship into an irreversible and unproductive asymmetry”.
“Bipartisanship has divided our country into multiple dualism: republicans and democrats; big government and small government; private sector and public sector. We became more republicans and democrats than Americans. This culture of division of Americans into two camps stifles innovative political thinking and creation of new innovative political organizations. If we want to keep our position as world leader and improve the well being of Americans, our nation political structure must be innovative and open channels of new political energies.”
“We are in the 3rd millennium; the digital revolution is creating radical transformations in the United States of America and around the world. But, the ideological structure of Bipartisanship is totally incompatible with the extraordinary innovations of our time. Ideological solutions of the 20th century are obsolete; we are now in a world of “Rational Solutions” created by digital revolution”
The $1.1 trillion spending bill is a consequence of an irreversible and unproductive asymmetry creates by “Bipartisanship”. It satisfied the immediate political interest of the White House, the political parties and Wall Street, but undermine our democracy and economic system for the following reasons:
-Citigroup wrote the new banking deregulation; consequently the bill does not represent the will of the American people.
- Increase donation to party committees from $ $97,200 to $ $777,000 each year. Money should not be a determinant factor of democracy.
-This bill eliminates the Lincoln Amendment (section 716) of Dodd-Frank and increase “moral hazard” in our financial system. Section 716 regulates the derivatives that were at the origin of the financial crisis of 2008. Dodd-Frank Prohibition Against Federal Government Bailouts of Swaps Entities  (swaps push-out rule) involves only 5% to 10% of banks’ activities.
- The American people will again bailout Wall Street big banks in case of financial crisis. This bill eliminates the rule of accountability that define capitalism.
- The bill is an expression of the division of American society in 2 opposing camps: Wall Street versus Main Street.
We were warned by Ms. Brooksley Born (chairperson of the CFTC ,  August 1996 - June1999). Her warning about the risk of uncontrolled derivative market has been validated by the financial crisis of 2007-08.  Now, 3 women warn us: Elizabeth Warren, Maxine Waters and Nancy Peloci. The nature of this bill is more dangerous than “Bipartisanship” ideological conflict. It is not about  Democrat, Republican, Liberal, Conservative, Left or Right. It undermines free-market capitalism, democracy and increase fundamental systemic risk that can destabilize the American society.
On December 10, 2014 Thomas Hoenig Vice Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation made the following statement: “In 2008 we learned the economic consequences of conducting derivatives trading in taxpayer-insured banks. Section 716 of Dodd-Frank is an important step in pushing the trading activity out to where it should be conducted: in the open market, outside of taxpayer-backed commercial banks. It is illogical to repeal the 716 push out requirement. In fact, under 716, most derivatives -- almost 95% -- would not be pushed out of the bank. That is because interest rate swaps, foreign exchange and cleared credit derivatives can remain within the bank. In addition, derivatives that are used for hedging can remain in the bank. The main items that must be pushed out under 716 are uncleared credit default swaps (CDS), equity derivatives and commodities derivatives. These are, in relative terms, much smaller and where the greater risks and capital subsidy is most useful to these banking firms.” (www.fdic.gov)

The bill is not an improvement of American capitalism, but fuel the dynamic of creation of “sub-capitalism” in United States of America. Nothing has change since the financial crisis of 2007-2008; the market of derivatives markets is bigger in 2014. The total notional value, of these synthetic assets was about US$ 500 trillion in 2007-2008, and it is more than US$ 700 trillion today.  But, the value of the world's financial assets is US$156 trillion in 2014 ( businessinsider.com- MAR 2014), the US treasury grew from US$4.5tn in 2007 to US$11.9tn in 2013. The big banks are bigger today than in 2007. Assets of the 4 largest banks have increase by more than $2 trillion since the financial crisis. The possibility of new financial crisis is bigger today.

The $1.1 trillion spending bill is a legislation that prepares the next financial crisis. It shows that the power of Wall Street big banks increase under Democrat and Republican presidents. Financial crisis are a succession of bad decisions taken by our political leaders and they are exacerbate by degradation of moral value. This bill does not create a market discipline that capitalism needs to prosper, it is an ideological solution created by Bipartisanship. In the 21st century, the future of American capitalism will be define by rational solution create by new dynamics of “knowledge society”.




Sunday, June 22, 2014

Trade Misinvoicing and Illicit Financial Flows in Sub-Saharan Africa

Trade Misinvoicing and Illicit Financial Flows
in Sub-Saharan Africa

Last year, Global Financial Integrity (GFI) and the African Development Bank published a report indicating that from 1980–2009 unrecorded illicit financial outflows from Africa represent US $1.22-1.35 trillion(1). The World Bank estimates the total GDP of Sub-Saharan Africa at US $2,249.95 billion in 2013. In a new report published on May 12, 2014 GFI(2) put light on illicit financial outflows created by trade misinvoicing in Sub-Saharan Africa. The report shows that between 2002 and 2011, illicit financial flows has moved US $60.8 billion out of Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda. Global Financial Integrity defines under-invoicing of exports as the primary method for shifting money illicitly out of the country and under-invoicing of imports illegally smuggled capital into the country. Trade misinvoicing lowers government revenues and consequently handicaps economic growth.

It represents important tax losses. During the period of 2002 and 2011, the yearly tax losses of Ghana could be estimated at $368 million (11% of total government revenue); Kenya $435 million; Mozambique $187 million; Tanzania $248 million; and Uganda $243 million. The report indicated that the total cumulative trade misinvoicing (export under-invoicing, import under-invoicing, export over-invoicing, and import over-invoicing) could be estimated at $14.39 billion in Ghana (7th−largest economy in Africa-GDP growth 7.9% in 2012); $13.58 billion in Kenya (world leader in mobile money system-GDP growth 4.6% in 2012); $5.27 billion in Mozambique (4th largest gas reserves in the world-GDP growth 7.4% in 2012); $18.73 billion in Tanzania (Soon to be world leading LNG exporter - GDP growth 6.9% in 2012); and $8.84 billion in Uganda (2.5 billion barrels of oil-GDP growth 3.4% in 2012). All 5 of these African States are natural resource rich countries. Ghana is the world’s 2nd largest producer of cacao, after Ivory Coast. Cacao export generates about US $1.6 billion in foreign exchange for Ghana. This country has the 5th largest oil reserve in Africa, with an oil reserve that could reach 5 billion barrels in 2015. Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania are compliant countries with the Extractives Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI), but Kenya and Uganda are not members of this organization. Transparency International corruption perceptions index ranked Ghana number 63/177; Tanzania 111/177; Mozambique 119/177; Kenya 136/177; and Uganda 140/177. Trade misinvoicing is more prevalent in resources-rich countries.

With these two reports, we can conclude that the African continent should not experience a high level of debt and poverty. As stated by Global Financial Integrity, Africa is a net creditor to the world.

1-http://www.afdb.org)
2-Global Financial Integrity: Hiding in Plain Sight
Trade Misinvoicing and the Impact of Revenue Loss

in Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda: 2002-2011, by Raymond Baker, Christine Clough, Dev Kar, Brian LeBlanc, Joshua Simmons – Funded by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark - May 2014  

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

African sovereign bonds

African sovereign bonds
According to Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes

Senegalese debt returned 9% (Bloomberg-Jan 14, 2014).It is the best among benchmark Sub-Saharan African Eurobonds. This success is an important sign of debt market positive growth in Sub Sahara Africa. We should expect more sovereign debt issuance in this region. This year 8 nations of West African franc zone are planning to issue $6.2 billion of debt (Up by 31%) (Reuters, Jan 7th 2014). Senegal is one of the few rated country in Sub Sahara Africa and member of the CFA zone backed by France. The economy of Senegal is expected to grow from 4% to 4.6% in 2014 according to the World Bank.